Comparer les modèles

Galaxy Z Fold4 vs iPhone 17 Pro Max

  • Garantie commerciale de 12 mois
  • Livraison standard offerte
  • Retour gratuit sous 30 jours
Galaxy Z Fold4
À partir de

Prix reconditionné :780,00 €

contre 1 799,00 € neuf

Voir les options
iPhone 17 Pro Max
À partir de

Prix reconditionné :1 156,00 €

contre 1 479,00 € neuf

Voir les options

Aperçu des différences

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (2022) and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (2025) represent two distinct approaches to high-end mobile engineering. While the Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a foldable multi-screen layout running Android, the iPhone 17 Pro Max features a traditional slab design powered by iOS. These devices cater to fundamentally different user preferences regarding form factor and daily interaction.

Modèles disponibles

Couleur

Capacité de stockage (Go)

Scores

Durabilité

When examining longevity and durability, these devices differ significantly in their release timelines, software update schedules, and physical build characteristics.

  • Release timeline and support: The iPhone 17 Pro Max benefits from a more recent release year, aligning with extended software support schedules, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold4 has a longer tenure in the market.
  • Physical design resilience: The iPhone 17 Pro Max utilizes a rigid unibody structure with advanced glass protection, while the Galaxy Z Fold4 features a complex mechanical hinge and flexible inner screen that requires careful handling over extended periods.
  • Repair considerations: Traditional slab smartphones like the iPhone generally present simpler structural maintenance pathways compared to multi-screen foldable devices.

Année de sortie

2022

2025

Compatible dernière mise à jour

Oui

Oui

Système d'exploitation

Android

iOS

Pliable

Oui

Non

Performances

Both devices deliver robust system performance and smooth multitasking capabilities, though they approach hardware efficiency through different software ecosystems.

  • Multitasking and memory: Both models include generous RAM allocations that allow background applications to remain active without sudden reloads, ensuring smooth transitions during demanding workflows.
  • System responsiveness: Modern processing architectures in both devices handle rapid app launching, high-frame-rate gaming, and intensive productivity tasks without noticeable stutter.
  • Battery behavior: The iPhone 17 Pro Max typically sustains long intervals between charges under mixed usage patterns, while the dual-screen configuration of the Galaxy Z Fold4 results in more frequent power replenishment during heavy tablet-mode utilization.

Qualité de l'écran

The visual experience represents the most prominent divergence between these two products, contrasting a tablet-like expanding workspace with a large, bright traditional display.

  • Display configuration: The Galaxy Z Fold4 provides a compact outer screen alongside an expansive inner folding display, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro Max features a single, large high-clarity panel.
  • Outdoor visibility: Both models incorporate high peak brightness capabilities that maintain legibility under direct sunlight, supported by adaptive refresh rates for smooth scrolling.
  • Media consumption: The foldable layout creates a nearly square canvas well-suited for split-screen multitasking, while the iPhone display format aligns closely with standard widescreen video content.

Résolution

1812 x 2176

2868x1320

Type d'écran

Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Super Retina XDR

Audiovisuel

Imaging hardware and media playback features are tailored to capture high-resolution photos and deliver reliable audio output for daily communication.

  • Lens versatility: Both systems integrate multiple rear lenses covering wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto perspectives to handle varied photography scenarios.
  • Low-light capture: Advanced image processing sensors on both devices preserve detail and manage noise effectively in dimly lit environments.
  • Audio delivery: Integrated stereo speaker setups on both models provide clear sound output for calls, podcasts, and media playback without requiring external accessories.

Caméra principale

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Caméra frontale

4 megapixels

18 megapixels

Divers

Practical daily usability elements, including connectivity standards, physical dimensions, and security sensors, shape how each device fits into a routine.

  • Connectivity and ports: Both smartphones support current cellular and wireless network standards, utilizing proprietary or universal port connections for charging and data transfer.
  • Authentication: The Galaxy Z Fold4 places its fingerprint sensor on the side power button, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max relies on facial recognition technology.
  • Handling and weight: The iPhone 17 Pro Max presents a wide slab profile, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a narrow profile when folded that expands into a heavier, broader device when opened.

Poids (en grammes)

263 g

233 g

Taille écran (pouces)

7.6

6.9

Réseau

5G

5G

Carte SIM

Double SIM physique + eSIM

eSIM

Verrouillage opérateur

Débloqué tout opérateur

Débloqué tout opérateur

Connecteur

USB-C

USB-C

L’avis de la communauté

User discussions across community forums often highlight the appeal of the Galaxy Z Fold4 for multitasking, split-screen workflows, and the novelty of a pocket-sized tablet experience. At the same time, users frequently note considerations regarding the visible crease on the inner screen and the heavier physical weight when closed. Conversely, the iPhone 17 Pro Max receives consistent praise for its reliable battery longevity, durable build quality, and seamless integration within the iOS ecosystem, though some users mention its large footprint can feel cumbersome in smaller pockets.

Users who prioritize a versatile multi-window workspace and expandable viewing area may prefer the Galaxy Z Fold4, while users who prioritize long battery endurance, a traditional slab format, and streamlined software support may lean toward the iPhone 17 Pro Max. For those exploring sustainable purchasing paths, opting for a quality-assured refurbished option provides an eco-friendly alternative to acquire either high-end device. Ultimately, the choice depends on whether a foldable workflow or a conventional high-performance smartphone structure better matches daily habits.